Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology - Hot Topics in Melanoma November 2024

Research Summary

2024-10-25 05:20:47

RESEARCH SUMMARY—Integrating the Melanoma 31-gene Expression Profile Test with Clinical and Pathologic Features Can Provide Personalized Precision Estimates for Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity: An Independent Performance Cohort

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended for patients with melanoma and a likelihood of SLN positivity above 10 percent, and it should be considered in patients with a 5 to 10 percent likelihood of SLN positivity. Currently, up to 88 percent of SLNBs return negative results, so an improved method for stratifying patients is needed. The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test for cutaneous melanoma has been shown to stratify patients at low- (Class 1A), intermediate- (Class 1B/2A), and high-risk (Class 2B) for disease recurrence, metastasis, mortality, and SLN positivity. The integrated 31-GEP (i31-GEP) combines the 31-GEP risk score and clinicopathological features to further improve risk stratification for SLN positivity. In this retrospective study, Kriza et al1 analyzed the utility of the i31-GEP in the prediction of SLN positivity among patients with cutaneous melanoma. Their findings are summarized below.

Data were gathered from patients treated at a single academic community hospital from 2015 to 2020. SLNB was offered to patients with melanoma lesions 0.8mm or greater and those with lesions 0.6mm or greater and shave biopsy with positive margin. All patients who received SLNB also underwent i31-GEP testing.

A total of 156 patients were included for analysis. Fifty-eight percent of patients were male, and the median age was 64 years. Most patients presented with T2 (T2a: 21.8%, T2b: 7.7%; total: 29.5%) or T1 (T1a: 10.9%, T1b: 18.0%; total: 28.9%) tumors. A total of 25.6 percent of patients had T3 tumors (T3a: 12.8%, T3b: 12.8%), and 16.1 percent had T4 tumors (T4a: 5.8%, T4b: 10.3%). The median Breslow thickness was 1.8mm. Fifty-four patients (34.6%) had ulceration, and the median mitotic rate was 2/mm2. Most tumors were located on the trunk (44.9%) or an extremity (43%), with only 12.2 percent of tumors located on the head and neck.

Overall, 32 patients (20.5%) had a positive SLN. Of the 17 T1a tumors included, 15 had at least one high-risk factor (e.g., mitotic rate ≥2/mm2, age <40 years, lymphovascular invasion, microsatellites, etc.), and thus were considered as having a 5-to-10-percent risk of SLN positivity.

According to i31-GEP test results, 30 patients were identified as having a less than five percent risk of SLN positivity. Thirtytwo patients were identified as having a 5 to 10 percent risk of SLN positivity, and 94 were identified as having a risk above 10 percent. The classification of 30 patients with T1 to T2 tumors as having less than five percent risk of SLN positivity indicated a significant potential decrease in SLNB with the use of the i31-GEP test. Among 43 patients with T1a or T1b tumors, who were considered as having a 5-to-10-percent risk of SLN positivity as per current guidelines, 22 (51.2%) were reclassified as having less than five percent risk, and five (11.6%) were reclassified as having a greater-than- 10-percent risk. Six of 111 patients with a greater-than-10-percent risk of SLN positivity per current guidelines (T2–T4 tumors) were determined to have less than five percent risk of SLN positivity with i31-GEP testing, and sixteen patients were reclassified as having 5 to 10 percent risk.

The SLN positivity rate was zero percent for all patients with less than five percent risk of SLN positivity as determined by the i31-GEP test. Two patients (6.3%) with 5-to-10-percent risk were positive for SLN. Thirty patients (31.9%) with a greater-than- 10-percent risk as per the i31-GEP test had a positive SLN; among these patients, 10 had T1 to T2 tumors, and 20 had T3 to T4 tumors. The rate of SLN positivity was similar in patients with T1 to T2 tumors (33.3%) and those with T3 to T4 tumors (31.3%). Considering specific disease stages in the greater-than-10-percent risk group, the rate of SLN positivity was highest in highest in T2a (37.5%), T2b (33.3%), T3a (47.4%), and T3b (35.0%) tumors. The SLN positivity rate was zero percent for T1a tumors and 25.0 percent for T1b tumors. T4a and T4b tumors had SLN positivity rates of 22.2 and 12.5 percent, respectively.

The sensitivity and specificity of the i31-GEP test were 100 and 24.2 percent, respectively. Negative predictive value was 100 percent, and positive predictive value was 25.4 percent. Subgroup analysis of T1 to T2 tumors showed that the i31-GEP had 100-percent sensitivity and 37.5-percent specificity, as well as a negative predictive value of 100 percent and positive predictive value of 18 percent.

Limitations include the small sample size, the retrospective nature of the study, and the absence of follow-up data. Furthermore, this was a single-center study, so the broader patient population might not have been represented in this sample.

Based on these findings, Kriza et al concluded that utilization of the i31-GEP test can help improve the prediction of SLN positivity in patients with T1 to T4 cutaneous melanoma, which may reduce the number of unnecessary SLNB procedures. Furthermore, implementation of the i31-GEP test can help improve personalized patient care.

REFERENCE

  1. Kriza C, Martin B, Bailey CN, Bennett J. Integrating the melanoma 31-gene expression profile test with clinical and pathologic features can provide personalized precision estimates for sentinel lymph node positivity: an independent performance cohort. World J Surg Oncol. 2024;22(1):228.

©Matrix Medical Communications. View All Articles.

Research Summary
https://jcad.mydigitalpublication.com/articles/research-summary?article_id=4877951&i=834717

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Issue List
  • Advertisers
  • Website

Issue List

March 2026

Hot Topics in Alopecia February 2026

February 2026

January 2026

Chronic Hand Eczema: Understanding a Complex and Persistent Inflammatory Disease

December 2025

Hot Topics in Alopecia November 2025

Science of Skin Summit 2025

Hot Topics in Melanoma November 2025

November 2025

October 2025

September 2025

Hot Topics in Alopecia Areata August 2025

August 2025

July 2025

Hot Topics in Melanoma July 2025

June 2025

Hot Topics in Pigmented Lesions May 2025

May 2025

April 2025

Hot Topics in Melanoma April 2025

March 2025

February 2025

January 2025

December 2024 Supplement 3

Dermatology Conference Highlights 2024

December 2024

November 2024

Hot Topics in Melanoma November 2024

October 2024

September 2024 Supplement 2

September 2024

August 2024

July 2024

Hot Topics in Squamous Cell Carcinoma July 2024

June 2024

May 2024 Supplement 2

May 2024

April 2024

Hot Topics in Psoriasis March 2024

March 2024

Supplement - March 2024

Hot Topics in Psoriasis February 2024

February 2024

January 2024

Supplement - December 2023

December 2023

Supplement - December 2023

Vitiligo Conference Highlights: November 2023

November 2023

Supplement - November 2023

Supplement - October 2023

October 2023

Hot Topics in Melanoma October 2023

Supplement - September 2023

September 2023

Hot Topics in Skin Health September 2023

Supplement - August 2023

August 2023

Hot Topics in Melanoma August 2023

Hot Topics in Skin Health July 2023

Hot Topics in Psoriasis July 2023

Hot Topics in Psoriasis June 2023

Hot Topics in Skin Health May 2023


Library